Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.727
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ASAS : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Agregat: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan FIDUSIA : JURNAL KEUANGAN DAN PERBANKAN Revenue: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Islam Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Keuangan Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa Smart: Journal of Sharia, Tradition, and Modernity Salam (Islamic Economics Journal) IIJSE
Hanif Hanif
UIN Raden Intan Lampung
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman

 1 
Criticism of Reason against the Blasphemy of Ijma as a Source of Islamic Law Moh. Bahrudin; Faisal Faisal; Hanif Hanif
Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 22, No 1 (2022): Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (669.38 KB) | DOI: 10.24042/ajsk.v22i1.12527

Abstract

The study and critique of reasoning against the blasphemy of ijmak aims to place the position of ijmak proportionally and rationally, in accordance with the initial objectives of the ijmak theory formulated in the early days of Islam so that there are no misperceptions about the blasphemy of ijmak. Indeed, ijmak as a source of Islamic law requires the existence of evidence based on the Qur'an and Hadith, it cannot stand alone independently. However, furthermore, ijmak only becomes a support for the status quo of the fiqh laws produced by the cleric contained in fiqh books. This research is intended to look at the blasphemy of ijmak as a source of Islamic law. The method used is descriptive method. Conclusions are drawn by using deductive thinking. Research shows that ijmak can be used as evidence, has validity and authority, although it still requires evidence from the Qur'an or Sunnah. Not all ijmak is qath'i and therefore not all ijmak must be followed. The blasphemy quality of ijmak is qath'i if it is supported by texts that are qath'i or related to matters that are 'ulima min al-din bi al-dharurah. The quality of ijmak is zhanni if it is only supported by zhanni's argument or in matters for which there is no explicit text in the syarak text.
Co-Authors Abd. Qohar Ade Eko Setiawan Desma Susilawati Dian Puspita Erike Anggraeni Faisal Faisal Fatullah Iqbal Febrian Maulana Putra Heni Noviarita Idham Idham Imam Shoffan Hasyim Is Susanto Liky Faizal Liya Ermawati Mardhiyah Hayati Moh Bahrudin Moh. Mukri Mutiara Eka Putri Nur Wahyu Ningsih SONIA AFTIKA Syamsul Hilal Tulus Suryanto Yulistia Devi